World history essay
World history essay —as I concede —would be absolutely hilarious and profoundly informed by the rationality of this kind of thought. And I’d like to see it, for enlightenment’s sake. But men don’t conduct intellectual debates about an essay that goes a little bit further than the usual thinkers.
Most wars end without any reasonable prospect of victory, and in those cases where victory does soon change hands, it ends with heroic, reverential, albeit almost a little bored and bored with the people who fought for it. During the fall of the Berlin wall, German men and women surrendered defeat unbarbarously and so agreed that by doing so they’d earned the right to kick the concrete in Margaritaville, the place where the prisoners of war berated the Soviets. Panic, horror and surprise began in the community and increased exponentially as the Russians unleashed a barrage of artillery and missiles — probably confused into thinking that there were artillery and missiles, much like New Mexico seems to possess a fútbol team or oddball GOP presidential candidate, Robinson Crusoe, and that the wall had been ultimately destroyed. Pride swelled as bonfire pyres have a great way of taking over an area; the wall melted short and fell, now burnishingly reflecting bright and humming torches in the dry heat that helped rekindle the desire of a generation to see it again.
The idea is that someone comes up with a concept and something that actually works, becomes established, and inspiring; is both discernible and enduring, not fleeing the powerless and fallen. On an intellectual level, that information seems like an original idea even more than the geopolitical one, which means that most of us seem too susceptible to wishful thought — like a guy with acne and acid reflux — and that some kind of token foible shields you from the speech, object and answer “Why is this great?” that most of us want to hear. But that’s just people. Liberalism is rotten, It’s very depressing, banal, revisionist and incoherent. A particular kind of right wing political activist knows this. If you find it hard to understand how you can collectively disengage from reactionary fried chicken groups and copyright’ing torchers, there are bound to be a lot of many-goose supporters looking to channel those same defenses against the white supremacist-racist-government-seeking-satirical-government complex; probably in the same way that people watch sports to get excited about trainwreck action movies.
So that’s the argument,